✦ An independent civic guideResearch edition

Institutions

Office of Courts Administration

Assists the Supreme Court’s Chief Justice in administering the court system. It handles resources, budgets, procedures, and support services; it is not a forum for appealing judgments.

Art. 2.016 ↗General responsibilities ↗ · Sources consulted:

Oficina de Administración de los Tribunales · Office of Courts Administration

OfficeState-levelActive

Spanish legal name: Oficina de Administración de los Tribunales. Spanish legal names are retained. Some English names are functional translations.

Government level
State-level
Branch or grouping
Judicial
Type
Office
Sources consulted
Oct 18, 2026

What it does

  • Develops a uniform administrative system and facilitates staff, facilities, and funding for court operations. Administration supports judicial work; it does not determine litigation outcomes.Uniform Administrative System; Resource Facilitation ↗ · Sources consulted:
  • Requests and justifies funding for the system and assesses how legislation affects its operations. This differs from enacting laws or independently appropriating all public funds.Budget Management; Legislative Assessment ↗ · Sources consulted:
  • Maintains information systems for public information, planning, and evaluation of judicial and administrative activity. It also recommends operational improvements and judicial assignments to the Chief Justice.Information Systems; Recommendations and Improvements ↗ · Sources consulted:
  • Investigates misconduct involving judicial personnel, including judges outside the Supreme Court, under its official responsibilities. Investigating an administrative complaint and deciding a judicial appeal are different processes.Misconduct Investigations ↗ · Sources consulted:

In everyday life

Someone locating a court division or support service can use the judicial directory. OAT helps maintain the administrative system supporting those services. If the person disagrees with a judge’s decision, that information request must be distinguished from the appropriate judicial proceeding: administrative personnel cannot replace adjudication of the case.Uniform Administrative System; Resource Facilitation ↗Art. 4.006 ↗ · Sources consulted:

How to distinguish it from other institutions

The Supreme Court adopts administrative rules; its Chief Justice directs the system; the Administrative Director and OAT help carry out that task. These are linked responsibilities, not three different levels of court.Art. V, sec. 7 ↗Arts. 2.012, 2.016 ↗ · Sources consulted:

A request about operations or administrative resources differs from challenging a judgment. Decisions are reviewed through the applicable judicial proceedings, not by asking OAT to change the ruling.Arts. 2.016, 3.002, 4.006 ↗Art. 4.006 ↗ · Sources consulted:

Official services and information

Confirm requirements, forms, and schedules on the linked official portal.

Where it fits

Map groupings support navigation; they do not themselves establish reporting authority.

Legal basis

Constitution art. V, sec. 7, provides for court administration and its director. Act 201-2003, arts. 2.012 and 2.016, describes the Chief Justice’s authority and OAT. The Office belongs to the judiciary; it is not an executive agency reporting to the governor.Art. V, sec. 7 ↗Arts. 2.012, 2.016 ↗ · Sources consulted:

The enabling reference is a reading aid. Consult applicable texts and amendments in official sources; directory cards can retain older references.

Leadership & appointments

Administrative Director of the Courts

The Chief Justice appoints the Administrative Director, who must be a lawyer and serves at the Chief Justice’s discretion. This is not a gubernatorial appointment subject to Senate confirmation. The official site identifies Sigfrido Steidel Figueroa as Director; assistant directors are designated with the Chief Justice’s approval.Art. 2.016 ↗Administrative Director ↗ · Sources consulted:

Sigfrido Steidel Figueroa

Sources consulted: Oct 18, 2026 · Sources & method ↓

Appointment
Verification pending
Confirmation
Verification pending
Term end
Verification pending

Governance & composition

It has no corporate board. The institutional page separately identifies the Judicial Advisory Council, comprising administrative judges from Appeals and trial-court regions. That council advises; it does not replace the Chief Justice or make OAT an appellate court.Judicial Advisory Council ↗Art. 2.016 ↗ · Sources consulted:

Sources consulted: Oct 18, 2026

Sources & method

The consultation date is not the institution’s own update date.

  1. Constitución de Puerto Rico — Artículo V (Poder Judicial) ↗https://poderjudicial.pr/constitucion/articulo-v/Sources consulted: Oct 18, 2026
  2. Poder Judicial — Oficina de Administración de los Tribunales ↗https://poderjudicial.pr/oficina-administracion-de-los-tribunales/Sources consulted: Oct 18, 2026
  3. https://poderjudicial.pr/constitucion/ ↗https://poderjudicial.pr/constitucion/Sources consulted: Oct 17, 2026
  4. Ley 201-2003 — Ley de la Judicatura (compilación OGP) ↗https://bvirtualogp.pr.gov/ogp/Bvirtual/LeyesOrganicas/Pages/201-2003.pdfSources consulted: Oct 18, 2026 · Document revised: May 21, 2026
  5. Poder Judicial — Directorio ↗https://poderjudicial.pr/directorio-del-poder-judicial/Sources consulted: Oct 18, 2026
How we verify →